from a interview with Prof. Dr. Hans-Hermann Hoppe in the "Wiener Zeitung":
[... ] In Chicago, for example, several people complained about police brutality. In 95 percent of all cases, the complaints were abgeschmettert simply by the courts in less than one percent of the cases the people were right. This result can we anticipate, given that courts and police are part of the same organization.
National Supervisory you think is not a useful way?
Imagine you were the state and would be used for self-control your uncle as a judge, the aunt is sitting as a financial inspector and your father in the Ethics Commission. They are united by the interest of maximizing the revenue of your organization and expand your power. Of course there are sometimes differences of opinion between the Constitutional Court, Government and Parliament. Nevertheless, it is easy to see that the Constitutional Court always has the interest in their own area of which it determined to expand and promote the financing of the state as a whole.But all must nevertheless comply with the laws, even the politicians!
No, you do not. In all societies there is a difference between private and public law. If I take away something as a private person or order for forced labor, I was condemned for it. But if I do as a public servant, which is considered "collect taxes" or "confiscation for military service." Not all persons subject to the gleichen'Gesetzen. As a public person, I can do things I never expected to do as a private person. What to steal from private individuals " und hehlen" nennt, gilt beim Staat als Sozialpolitik...
